Would You Like Some Cheese With That Whine?

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin filed this motion a couple of days ago in his Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness.

If the Gentle Reader can manage to slog through reading it all, he will see that what this motion boils down to is “I haz sad ‘cuz Aaron said mean things about me!” That’s not much of a legal argument. Also, TDPK makes only the silliest of arguments to show the judge how he erred in granting Aaron Walker leave to file a slightly over-length reply to TDPK opposition to a motion. (Is that confusing enough?)


138 thoughts on “Would You Like Some Cheese With That Whine?

  1. While there’s a whole lot of tl;dr going on there I read enough of it to wonder why TDPK is arguing against blog posts and not filed motions, oppositions, etc. That boy’s got a lot of derp in him.

    • Good point. In other motions he goes on at length about the alleged injuries suffered by family members, who are not parties to the proceedings and whom he cannot represent.

      • Again, this is tantamount to practicing without a license. So why isn’t that being challenged or his standing being challenged? Sorry Brett, you don’t get to drag your family into your dinky suit.

      • When Kimberlin asked for a delay to “negotiate” to obtain a lawyer I had two initial thoughts. The first was Kimberlin was trying to lure some lawyer into a contingency fee arrangement. The second was that Kimberlin was in fact trying to hire a lawyer to represent his wife and family so that they could join his lawsuit. Kimberlin could write motions for her to file pro se, but, Mrs Kimberlin, and the children, probably couldn’t be coached sufficiently to handle personal appearances in court. In that case, the negotiations would be about allowing Kimberlin to share attorney duties with Kimberlin writing all motions and the attorney representing them only in court. No attorney valuing his law license would have touched that arrangement with a ten-foot pole.

      • Betty – I think it is, too. Apparently, he has affidavits from his daughter in the state case attesting to her alleged damages, and she is not a party.
        By the way, your stalker is back.
        Prediction: the next “breaking” news from the Charybdis of Elkridge will be BK’s filing motions against Levy plus a bar complaint.

    • Really? What did he say? I have him blocked. I saw my attorney yesterday and I have another meeting with my firm next week.

      • Yeah, I went and found that. I try to stay off his feed, but for now, I’m supposed to collect any attempted contact or “doxing”. Somebody is screwing with him.

  2. So, let me get this straight: Walker should not be allowed to discuss Kimberlin extrajudicially, but Kimberlin is allowed to grant interviews and give his version of events to “mouthpiece” CBBS, who stated on his blog on Feb. 7 that he is biased in favor of Kimberlin? Got it.

  3. Aaron, why are you bullying the terrorist who’s suing you?

    Really, TDPK, have you ever considered comedy? There must be something non-criminal that you’re competent at. That might be it.

  4. Heh. Aaron is filing Pro Se, that is as himself. The fact that he is an attorney is immaterial to representing himself. To be filing as an attorney, he must be acing for another.
    Second, a question: Is BK again publishing information from sealed court documents? I cannot remember if the records and documents have been unsealed or not.
    Third, Brett is a whiney and delusional ass isn’t he?

  5. What the hell? I’d say this is getting ridiculous, but it is beyond ridiculous.

    Who files a motion to reconsider a decision to extend a page limit?

    Rule 11 is made for this.

      • the sin was in opposing it in the first place. Yes, he has a right to, but what you have a right to do, and what is wise to do, is often two very different things. having committed that original “sin” it wouldn’t do much worse to file a very brief motion to reconsider saying, “please, your honor, consider what i filed just after you ruled.” but instead he compounded it with silliness.

        Really barring truly extraordinary circumstances, you don’t oppose a motion like this. and you certainly don’t using bigotry.

      • He probably thinks he’s retaliating against Walker & Hoge’s motions against his petition to extend the time to respond.

        The difference is Walker didn’t lie to the court to get his motion. And Walker’s motion hardly had a substantive impact on the case.

  6. BREAKING: “DERANGED CYBERSTALKER BILL SCHMALFELDT” lies again when he claims to be an unbiased “reporter.”

    Every time he claims that he wants “both sides” of the story in his ongoing pretense of being an unbiased reporter, someone should post this excerpt from his blog, which he posted on Feb. 7, 2014, then conveniently deleted along with all other content. And I mean EVERY time. Money quote: “But I will not be unbiased.”

    “Now, I will report aggressively on Brett Kimberlin’s lawsuit against Hoge and his co-defendants. But I will not be unbiased. I have news that I am sitting on until early next week. It is not good news for Hoge and his co-defendants. (I’ll tell you this much. I won’t say if it’s the state case, the RICO case, or both. Some will save themselves at the expense of others. This is not speculation.)
    And I can’t fucking WAIT until I can write about it without risking the outcome.

    And for every dollar Kimberlin takes from Hoge, for every piece of property Kimberlin takes from Hoge, for every bit of suffering Kimberlin causes Hoge, I will smile. I will laugh. God forgive me, I want the man to suffer. And according to this story I am sitting on, suffer he will.

    Remember where you read it.

    Suffer, he will. It won’t match what he’s done to me. But it will be a small measure of satisfaction to have lived long enough to see Karma bite him on his pockmarked, pimply ass.”

    • And let us not forget that his own lawyer told a judge that Bill was NOT a journalist. Bill didn’t object to that characterization. So when he claims to be one just ask why, during a sworn court hearing, he allowed it to be entered into the record that he is not a journalist.

    • he removed all doubt when he falsely accused seth allen of doing what brett later accused John Norton of doing (and Norton was found innocent of, anyway), and me of supposedly conspiring with seth to do the thing that brett was not even accusing him of. And then when i pointed out the massive gaps in his logic, he declared my objection proof that i was guilty. and then even when he was accusing Norton of the same conduct he didn’t take down the old post or even make a correction. For months his knowingly wrong piece was up on his site without correction.

      He is lying when he says he is interested in the other side. He isn’t. That’s why i called him Baghdad Blob.

      • And now he is predictably saying his lawyer didn’t say what he said. With Bill it’s always a game of run and hide. Memory hole all the old lies while telling fresh ones.

      • Interestingly, he posted BK’s complaint in that case before it was served to the accused – and there is no “PACER” in Maryland, so he did not get it off of some court website. And that was well before he claims that he had met BK.

    • I remember where I read it!

      What confuses me (besides reading his attempts at scare-quote “journalism,” that is) is why I haven’t read MORE?

      On February 7th, he promised DOOOOOM by “early next week.” Surely it’s not too much to presume the following Wednesday, February 12th would be the very trailing edge of “early?”

      Now it’s February 20th – nearly TWO FULL WEEKS later – and he hasn’t dropped the hammer. What did he write in the meantime to risk the outcome?

      Tell you what: I have a live half-hour talk show on Blog Talk Radio. How about you contact me and we’ll arrange an interview. I’ll ask you only one question, and you let you have the rest of the time, uncensored and unedited. You can let your diseased mind run free like a tiger in the jungles of India. I won’t stop you or even try to slow you down.

      I prooooomise to be faaaaair. Hooooonest!!!!!

    • “Some will save themselves at the expense of others. This is not speculation.”

      Don’t they say this about every six weeks?

  7. Those of us with literal, visual imaginations thank you “A.”

    For those who didn’t read the doc: He actually objects to the headline above Aaron’s articles like “Convicted Perjurer Brett….’ What difference does THAT make to motion to file a few extra pages. None. And why do Hoge and Walker have so much to write about? The lawsuit, that’s why.

    Lighten up, Francis.

    • I’m curious, he complains about your posting of his/your motions after they are filed, is there any legal reason why you can’t do that, or shouldn’t?

      • They are all public documents.

        Well, except for when TDPK violates the protective order and includes discovery materials in his pleadings in violation of a court order.

  8. BREAKING: Biased Bill gets notice of appearance for attorney in RICO case. Wonders if he’s getting sued. Will he poop the bed and blame the dogs?

    Oh, and a direct quote from his blog, as it appeared on Feb. 7: “Now, I will report aggressively on Brett Kimberlin’s lawsuit against Hoge and his co-defendants. But I will not be unbiased.”

      • Here you go. Excerpt:

        “The eminent attorney T. Bruce Godfrey of Reistertown, Md., has joined the fray, representing the Frey and the Liberty Chick (Deputy LA County District Attorney Patrick Frey, aka “Patterico”; and Mandy Nagy of Breitbart.com, aka “Liberty Chick”).
        He filed his notice of appearance today. But there is a mystery here.
        Have I been added to the lawsuit for some reason? If so, why have I not been informed? If not, why is Mr. Godfrey mailing a copy of his notice of appearance to ME? All I’ve done in this case is share my concern with the Honorable Paul W. Grimm of Defendant WJJ Hoge’s abuse of me and now, his harboring of people making death threats against me — oddly enough on the same day as my first letter appeared on PACER. I don’t believe that makes me a party to the lawsuit, but I appreciate being kept informed.”

      • By the way, his “concerns” included mentioning his PD at least five times in his letter to Judge Grimm. It also included the sad admission that he has dementia: “Now I am wheelchair bound. There are other outward and not-quite-so visible signs of increased degeneration, including the onset of early Parkinson’s disease dementia.”

        BS has now forever memorialized in a federal court case the fact that he has dementia.

      • He’s being copied because he essentially inserted himself into the lawsuit as an interested party. I’m guessing that ALL of the attorneys are going to be copying him on everything now. Congratulations are in order for BS. He is now for all intents and purposes, a part of the lawsuit. Sort of.

    • CBBS is going to need a lot. Mr. Hoge is now supposed to worry about the liability for the damage us lickspittles are doing to the Moldwarp’s radio station!

      • He just called his station a commercial enterprise. Does he pay rights to the likes of George Carlin’s estate, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd? Just wondering.

      • Good question. I’d also like to know what legal doctrine makes party A responsible for everything party B does, just because they sortof, electronically, are acquainted. Is that another great legal claim to make the clerks laugh uproariously?

      • That was me. I figured we needed something that went with Lickspittle, and the definition I found when looking through Shakespearean insults sounded about right. It’s technically a mole, but seems to indicate someone who grubs in the dirt and seldom sees the light of day.

      • SAMK, if Schmalfeldt is actually using LIVE365, then they are taking care of the royalties. If he isn’t, his twitter timeline is pretty good evidence for BMI and ASCAP.

    • I believe you can purchase that through Amazon (using the link here at Hogewash!) … set up a stand at the entrance to the trailer park as I am sure CBBS’s neighbors could use some butt salve too! (Don’t forget the wheelchair ramp, gotta comply with the ADA …)

    • What “commercial” radio station? The one he is imagining? Is this like the imaginary death threats that are so terrifying he fails to report them to the police?

      • I concur, I listened and my review is that shaky should stick to deranged cyber stalking, he is at least good at that. Radio…not so much

  9. I am thinking of starting a business, and I’d like to run some potential names by the Lickspittles.

    Just imagine this name for a restaurant: “The Salmonella Cafe.”
    A bed and breakfast: “The Bedbug Inn – you’ll take a little bit of us home with you!”
    A dog kennel: “The Tasty Kitchen.”

    What do you think? Am I on the right track?

  10. I think the Cabin Boy’s radio station put my dog to sleep? That sucks, now I can’t get him to go outside! That’s it, banned from my computer; only real crap can do that!

    Reader, I think your on track.

  11. Willy, you have admitted in your own writings that you have dementia and are a biased writer.

    Don’t make us cut-and-paste the examples.

  12. Oh, and Willy, you might want to look up the definition of “commercial defamation”.

    It isn’t what you think it is.

    • He stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night! Of course he knows more about the law than anybody who just has a J.D. and has sat a bar exam!

      • he seems to be saying, our not listening isn’t the problem, our making fun of it is, apparently because that will somehow keep others from listening and making it a profitable venture for him.
        Now it may be true that in our mockery of his station, due to our distaste for the owner, others may choose not to listen, BUT it’s not really actionable in a court of law. If it were people who boycott and encourage others to, like the BDS crap that is going on, would be getting sued left and right…. Right?

        obviously I don’t know since I’m just a stupid lickspittle… ;P

      • I certainly haven’t made fun of it, and the only negative-ish comment I’ve seen on twitter was one about the name, nothing about the content.

        Hey, if he’d just leave Mr. Hoge and us poor little lickspittles alone, no one would need to “investigate”, right?

      • You can make as much fun of his useless “radio station” as you would like, it is protected speech.

        You cannot, however, assert false facts about it specifically in order to harm his business. However, given it isn’t a business, that would be almost impossible for him to prove.

      • there is no reason at all why Aaron shouldn’t do that. as an example look at Kimby’s own behavior. He turns over everything to the Cabin Boy to post before its even served on the defense or on the court.

    • If he filed a police report for the alleged threat against his dogs, he should post the report number. He didn’t file one, was gone the next day, and when he returned, tweeted out to the “cowards” for not killing them. That is not the behavior of someone who believes it was a genuine threat.

    • I asked him what that post had to do with a police report about a death threat. No answer yet. Surprise. Not that I’m expecting one; certainly not a coherent one.

  13. it seems obvious to me Bullspit Bill is just “throwing everything he can at the wall to see what sticks” in a effort to either force Hoge to shut down the comment section in part or the blog in whole…

    not gonna happen

    • He’s now claiming that Levy and Zoa and Hoge and Ace are “playing fast and loose with ethics”, and still ranting about how Levy can’t represent Ace because it’s a conflict of interest with Kimberlin. I think the passage he’s quoting doesn’t work because it says the lawyer should have written permission from all affected clients, but TK is not a current client, and in other places the passage is quite specific about past clients vs current clients.

      Either way, since Levy would be defending Ace the same way no matter who was trying to out her/him (remember according to BU Ace is a woman named Michelle – I wonder if that’s why Levy used the feminine pronoun?), Moldwarp would seem to be, as usual, completely wrong. And he’s still trying to litigate the fund for Tetyana. If he doesn’t stop ranting, I suspect he’ll get to spend some involuntary time someplace, jail or hospital, I don’t care.

      • Levy explains that he uses the feminine pronoun “she” in place of “he,” and that it should not be interpreted to mean that Ace is female. Ace is male, and has male genitalia that he is known to dip in pudding. Really, just google that.

      • Sorry, I know that Ace is a he. I was just wondering if they were playing into Team Kimberlin’s bizarre idee fixe that he was Michelle.

    • Mr Hoge can do as he pleases with his own blog. I like the way he runs the joint, myself; he encourages decent behavior that makes the blog a pleasant place to visit.

      But blog owners are broadly immunized from liability for the speech of others if they allow people to comment on their posts. That content (comments) doesn’t become their own speech unless they substantially alter the comment to change its meaning. And bloggers don’t lose the immunity if they excercise their prerogative to moderate, or if they don’t, or if they have rules, or don’t, or if they consistently enforce rules, or don’t.

      • Someone explained that, but I’m sure that BK and BS think it proves that BU was right when they doxed “Michelle”. If I were anonymous and BK and friends seemed to think I was a guy, I’d make sure any legal stuff used “he”, just to mess with them.

  14. Well if BS would be happy to provide any information we want…I want complete copies of all his hard drives sent to my lawfirm. Along with a comprehensive list of any and all persons that he has stalked, harassed and threatened in the last 4 years.

    THAT’S the information I want.

    • He seems to think that the very fact that Levy had represented Kimberlin in a public lawsuit is a secret that he cannot disclose. Of course, Levy’s name appears all over the court documents, which can be accessed by anyone. The name of the lawyer who represents you in public is not a secret, therefore is not privileged. He also does not understand that Levy pointed him in the direction of Kimberlin’s letter to Ace, a letter in which Kimberlin himself discloses that Levy had represented him.

      If Rick is reading, is there anything that can help this poor man with his dementia?

    • Note that in this post, Levy is quite critical of Aaron Walker and Dan Backer – two codefendants of Ace.

  15. Bill Schmalfeldt ‏@VeryBadRadio
    I deal with facts. I publish the facts from their source. I show the thing from which I am finding these facts. “U R FAT” is not a rebuttal.
    4:55 PM – 20 Feb 2014 · Details

    I deal in facts, too.

    FACT: BS has admitted that he is biased.
    FACT: BS has admitted that he has PD dementia.
    FACT: BS last year confessed that nothing he writes can be trusted.
    FACT: BS is an adjudicated harasser.

    • Reader, I’m sure that Bill will explain how those aren’t important facts. Or how he never said them. Or how we are completely misinterpreting them. Remember that we are all 4th graders next to his towering intellect. He still hasn’t told us his IQ, SAT or GRE.

      Bill doesn’t believe that “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.” He is entitled to anything he thinks is a fact, and if he determines it isn’t a fact, nothing will dissuade him from that error.

      • No. He didn’t. Though my high school student children can think rings around him, with half their brains tied behind their backs.

        I think that’s the most frustrating part of dealing with him. Absolutely NO logical thinking. I’m not used to dealing with that level of incoherence.

    • Well, he has finally confessed that he is not a reporter, but a biased opinion columnist. Now he knows why no one, other than Ali, has given him an interview.

  16. In the many silly and frivolous filings that TDPK has made, he has only succeeded in one thing – confirming to any and all – including the judge – that he is an utter loon.

    The bizarre irrelevant rantings, with bizarre, irrelevant “exhibits”, as well as the multiple brazen forgeries.

    All add up to TDPK showing his ass to the judge.

    Bad. Idea.

  17. I would like Bill to explain exactly how this matter is a) the same as or b) substantially related to the matter for which Levy represented Kimberlin.

    • And I’d like Cabin Boy to be able to coherently explain how he feeds himself. Neither of which Cabin Boy will be able to coherently explain.

  18. He’s now on about how Mr. Hoge has received TWO C&Ds, and that Mr. Hoge is responsible AND liable for every comment left on his blog, and that if we continue to be “defamatory and false” Mr. Hoge will bear the brunt of it. I’ve told him to show us the law saying that.

    I’m also continuing to demand his IQ, SAT or GRE results; since he is so much smarter than all of us, he must have high scores, mustn’t he?

  19. Bill, I think you are a huge coward.
    I think you were picked on a lot as a kid because you look brain damaged. I think because of all this picking on and bullying, that you are damaged beyond repair and now choose to lash out at the world rather than learning to love the little boy inside of you who was so hated by everyone else. I think that you want to find comfort in God, yet you can’t because you can’t figure out why a loving God would so punish a man with PD who has already been mercilessly mocked as a child. I think you are scared of your mortality and are absolutely terrified by the thoughts that creep up in your mind about how you have not amounted to much and how your kids will probably view your life once you are deceased. I think your most darkest of thoughts, the ones that cause you the most cognitive dissonance, concern your employment by Kimberlin. I think you nullify these darkest of thoughts by telling yourself that you have no choice at this point in your life, that you have to take the crumbs as you can get them, even if they are being left by a monster. I also think your radio station sucks, and that your career as a writer for the gov’t is the biggest Orwellian joke I could ever imagine. I think that you fear letting go of all this attacking and Kimberlin madness as then the silence would overwhelm you and force you to deal with the little boy who still wants to be loved.
    The are my protected opinions, and there is not a damn thing you can do about it.

  20. For an aperitif, there is a typically elegantly written Popehat post up re a case that involved attempts to get the identity of an anonymous blogger. The litigator, Ron Coleman, and PA Levy show up in the comments.

  21. So basically, TDPK is complaining that responses to his legal actions force him to make himself look really bad since he must inevitably make increasingly illogical, wild, baseless claims, statements and accusations not supported by any facts in his responses to the responses to his wild and baseless legal actions.

    You guys are so mean! You should just roll over and beg for mercy when accused by a convicted felon.

    Or am I overlooking something?

Leave a Reply