Prevarication Du Jour

Xenophon is telling lies over at Breitbart Unmasked again (No, I won’t link to it.)—BU20140114Z9871receiptWhat really happened was that The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s motion for alternate service on Ali Akbar was denied. You see, Maryland Rule 2-121(a) requires that service of process via mail be by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, Restricted Delivery. Unfortunately, TDPK didn’t check the box for Restricted Delivery on the Certified Mail green card. Also, and this is confirmed by the USPS mailing receipt he filed as an exhibit in his RICO status of service report, he didn’t pay for Restricted Delivery either. The Restricted Delivery charge in 2013 was $4.75 in addition to the $5.65 for Certified Mail with Return Receipt. Sure enough, the copy of the green card that Kimberlin filed with his motion for alternate service does not have the Restricted Delivery “Yes” box checked. Even if he had mailed the package to correct address, service would have not been valid.9871_a

Meanwhile, TDPK was unhappy that Ali’s lawyer was not being cooperative, that is to say, was looking out for his own client’s interests. In a fit of pique, TDPK filed a motion for sanctions against Ali’s lawyer, and, to make sure that he got it right this time, he included an exhibit that showed the green card with the box checked.9871_b

And he got caught.

And Judge Burrell was not amused by having two versions of the same document from the same party. Motion denied!

Furthermore, at no time during the hearing did Judge Burrell verbally order Ali’s lawyer to disclose Ali’s current address to TDPK, and she has not sent any such written order to Ali’s lawyer.

So what we have here is a notorious liar lying about what happened when a convicted perjurer got caught filing an apparently forged document with a court.


9 thoughts on “Prevarication Du Jour

  1. How do judges permit convicted felons and perjurers to get away with submitting documents of this nature in court?

    Two items, purporting to represent the same form, were submitted by the same person. One must be incorrect. It is possible that both are incorrect. It is extremely unlikely there is an acceptable reason for two different versions of the same document submitted to the court.

    Why isn’t their an investigation of such an act? Or is there?

  2. What’s more pathetic than Xenophon – a person who writes to defend a lying, incompetent pretend-lawyer bomber who abuses the legal system in a laughably ineffective attempt to stop people from writing about his crimes?

    The bomber himself is more pathetic than Xenophon.

  3. Pingback: Prevarication Du Jour | Will County Pro-se

Leave a Reply