Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

Last Thursday, The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin filed a status report with the U. S. District Court concerning his service of process on the defendants in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness. He included the following among his exhibits in that report.AliService

This appears to be a copy of the returned envelope of his attempted service on Ali Akbar. It appears to have sufficient postage that both the federal and state complaints could have been enclosed.

The Maryland state rule requires that service of process by mail be by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, Restricted Delivery. Note that the Restricted Delivery “Yes” box is not checked.AliServiceZoomThat means that the attempt as service was defective.

One of the motions heard yesterday in the Maryland Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. lawsuit was TDPK’s motion for alternate service declaring that Ali had been served. In support of that motion, TDPK submitted what was purported to be a copy of the same envelope, but that copy showed a check mark in the Restricted Delivery “Yes” box. When the Judge Burrell was made aware of the fact that Kimberlin has previously filed an exhibit containing a copy of the envelope that, like the federal filing, did not have the check mark, she noted the inconsistency between the two exhibits and denied TDPK’s motion.

It has been suggested that the exhibit filed with the motion for alternate service on Ali Akbar was forged. That is not inconsistent with the evidence.

23 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


  1. If it were a forgery, one possible way it was produced was by starting with the original, copying it, marking the “Restricted delivery” box, and, then copying it again. Each generation of a copy has a certain amount of degradation. If it were a second generation copy, or more, that probably could be determined by careful analysis. Courts take a dim view upon not submitting a copy of the original document. A person aiming to create a higher quality document could simply check the “restricted delivery” box on the original and then copy it. The problem with that strategy is that if the original unaltered receipt is subpoenaed the forger would no longer be able to produce it.


  2. Also, it seems to be a pretty straightforward experiment to print out both lawsuits, take them to Bethesda and ask how much postage is for each with, or without, restricted delivery.


  3. Even with the check, the envelope shows it wasn’t delivered. It has multiple stamps for attempts to deliver, and a final “return to sender” stamp. How could an envelope addressed to an apparently imaginary address be considered valid service?


    • Also, look at the barcode and the line labeled “article number” — are they the same? It appears those are unique…


    • I think Kimberlin’s claim was that Ali tried to “evade” service by refusing delivery. That claim was mooted when the delivery itself was ruled improper.


    • It has to be done in a particular way to be a valid attempt at service (service by mail requires restricted delivery.) It can be a valid attempt even if it doesn’t succeed. After valid attempts, a plaintiff can request alternate service. Kimberlin didn’t make any valid attempt, if the box was never checked, so his motion for alternate service was denied.


      • So I could mail something to 123 Nowhere Street, Madeupplace, MD and it would be a valid attempt at service so long as its marked restricted delivery?

        My point is that even without the restricted delivery, it was never a valid attempt.


      • @Rob Crawford
        IANAL, but this could be a case of the court passing on a later question (whether service to that address was valid) by answering the earlier one (whether BK completed the simple necessary paperwork.)
        So BK’s document troubles render the questions further down the line perhaps?

  4. Pingback: Team Kimberlin Post of the Day | hogewash | Dead Citizen's Rights Society


  5. If he represented the envelope as the identical envelope used in his earlier exhibit and RICO filing, same certified mailer card and all, he just attempted a fraud on the court. The only innocent explanation is ludicrously unlikely (some third party sneaked a check mark on the doc, which has confused the poor dear innocent Kimberlin.) Does he have any pals who would embarrass him in that way? Or does Kimberlin have a track record of sloppy lies and monkeying around with service requirements?


    • “Or does Kimberlin have a track record of sloppy lies and monkeying around with service requirements?”

      A track record … that’s one way of putting it.


  6. The Blob is now chronicling even the comments here. Takes a truly pathetic type of man to not only obsess over another man’s blog, but to also obsess about the comments made there. Seriously, how small of a person do you have to be to do that? What kind of empty life must you lead? How lonely must it be with no kids that speak to you, no friends (other than the 2 or 3 he talks with on Twitter that are actually manipulating him according to someone elses will) that you fill the emptiness with stalking a man’s blog just so you have some scrap to write about.

    Especially considering that he won’t allow comments on his own blog. COWARD!


    • Bill Schmalfeldt, vile and ignorant scum that he is, can blow me. He’s less than worthless, and I look forward to his fat ass being tossed in jail.

      How much would it cost me to get pictures of the look on his face when he’s led away, do you think?

      Just remember, Neckroll…

      When the guy in the shower tells you to pick up the soap, you probably shouldn’t go pick it up. I’m just sayin’. I dunno, maybe you’re into that. I don’t judge.


    • he’s been doing that, which is why I always finish my comments the way I do. Of course he claims he’s not the one creeping the blog but “others” tell him what is said, but then HE tweets screencaps of various comments… yeah, right someone ELSE is doing that for him. I don’t call him Bullshit Bill The Talking Wart for nothing…
      Oh and Fuck You Bill.


    • Yes, late last night it was “down for maintence” today “offline until further notice” and of course Bullshit Bill The Talking Wart is claiming KU is gonna “flip on his friends and rat everyone out”…as if there was anything TO rat out in the first place…
      I’m thinking more shenanigans from TK .
      Oh and Fuck You Bill


  7. Cabin Boy’s attempts to try to distract from DPBK being caught committing a fraud on the court would be hilarious were they not so utterly incompetent.

    I’ve seen more coherent ravings from a tertiary syphilitic.

Leave a Reply