Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

RICOMadnessOne of The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s lawfare tactics is to try to paint any opponent as engaging in shady behavior that’s more properly characteristic of Kimberlin’s own actions. Here’s a line from a post over at Breitbart Unmasked (No, I won’t link to it.)—BU20131206a

“A vexatious litigant” am I? Vexatious litigation is usually understood to be legal action initiated maliciously and without probable cause by an individual who is not acting in good faith for the purpose of annoying or embarrassing an opponent. Litigation winds up being classified as vexatious when an attorney or a pro se litigant repeatedly files groundless lawsuits and repeatedly loses.

The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin brags about having filed “over a hundred lawsuits.” What’s his record of winning?

He lost Kimberlin v. Crest Paragon Productions, his first RICO suit.
He lost the Kimberlin v. Walker I peace order.
He lost the Kimberlin v. Walker II peace order.
He lost the Kimberlin v. Norton peace order.
He lost the Kimberlin v. Elliott peace order.
He lost the B. Kimberlin v. T. Kimberlin protective order.
He lost Kimberlin v. DeLong, his appeal of the DeLong judgment.
He lost Kimberlin v. Department of Justice, et al., a suit seeking to keep Mrs. DeLong from collecting what he owed.
He lost Kimberlin v. Dewalt, his appeal of his parole revocation.
He lost Kimberlin v. Brewer, another parole related case.
He lost Kimberlin v. Department of Justice, his suit to be able to have an electric guitar in prison.

I could go on and on.

With all that in mind, the Gentle Reader should not be surprised to learn that more than one of the defendants in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO case are seeking to have the court find that Brett Kimberlin is a vexatious litigant.

6 thoughts on “Team Kimberlin Post of the Day

  1. I don’t remember you dehumanizing either. Seems to me you hold BS and Kimby to the minimum standards of society. If successful, you would actually humanize them. Carry on.

    • Then the fun begins! Kimberlin will refuse to make any effort to pay pleading poverty. Then, those awarded fees could demand to see the books of the JTMP. They could demand he increase his draw to satisfy his obligations. A nice touch would for those granted fees to have the JTMP ordered to cease expending funds on video productions, rental vehicles, bodyguards and such as waste that could otherwise be directed towards a larger draw and the satisfaction of the judgment.

      A peek into the books of the JTMP is likely to uncover that it takes a lot of money to keep Brett Kimberlin living in poverty!

  2. Of course they’re projecting their own behavior onto others. Otherwise they’d have to admit to themselves that they’re bad people.

    Could that list of cases be a preview of coming attractions? And wouldn’t it be fun to have “BK is a vexatious litigant” be one of those “Res Judicata” things? Whatever will he do if he can’t file frivolous suits against people? Oh noes, perhaps something actually useful?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s