I’m told that Bill Schmalfeldt has been whining about my “dirty victory” in court yesterday.
It’s true that my lawyer had a secret strategy that she used against him, and it worked: She let him talk.
Schmalfeldt repeated arguments that previously had been shot down. He asked irrelevant questions. He ranted. He yelled. He pounded the table. He convinced the judge that he intended to continue to disobey the peace order. In short, he made my case for me.
Bill Schmalfeldt can think that was a dirty trick if he wishes. I call it good lawyering.
Now, if Schmalfeldt will simply obey the peace order, I will have no reason to take any particular notice of him. We’ll see how that goes.
He is the Ted Kennedy of trailer park trash. Just leave him to his own devices. He’ll f**k it up on his own.
^ THIS… True Story. Every single time. It’s been happening for years with him. Bill really is his own worst enemy and not smart enough to realize it.
WJJ Hoge is engaging in dirty tricks: Not objecting to Schmalfeldt speaking in open court! Schmalfeldt expects you to help him from destroying his own credibility.
So what you’re saying is, “The best way to discredit Bill Schmalfeldt is to quote Bill Schmalfeldt.”
Your description of the courtroom proceedings make me want to read the court reporter’s transcript.
How dare Zoa and the judge let him talk. Last time he complained that he didn’t get a chance to talk, and that his victory would have been assured . . . oh, wait.
SchmallPecker makes my LULZ muscle ache.
Bwhahahahah Bill sinks his own ship when he opens his mouth? *gasp* who would of thunk. 🙂
A Reader, you are correct. Back in Oct. Zoa objected to most of what he tried to bring up and the judge upheld the objections. He even brought up Cassidy and the judge patiently explained it didn’t apply because it was a case of speaking ABOUT someone and not TO them. That he still doesn’t get that just goes to show his level of abject stupidity.
So now he has taken his twitter private. Not sure what that accomplishes since it will not prevent him from @mentioning Mr. Hoge. (Which the judge specifically told him was contact on several occasions now despite what the Cabin Boy wants to believe). I guess going private does afford him the opportunity to say his monumentally stupid things where only people that agree with him will see them and prevents others from pointing out said stupidity with much pointing and laughing.
Yes, it means the only people that can see his tweets are his hordes of followers. Some of this horde, I am told, may be actual people.
Please post the transcript if/when able. I’m rather interested in reviewing the arguments your opponent presented.
BS refuses to accept responsibility for the consequences of his behavior. When he lost last time, his excuses were: the judge is a corrupt country hick who has the hots for Zoa, Zoa is “connected,” the Court of Special Appeals was just too busy to take on this monumental first Amendment case. Oh, and all of this was unfair, in large part because he “SAYS” he has Parkinson’s. Heh. Gotta love Zoa Barnes.
Now, clearly given significant time to present his case, he lost again. Seriously, judging by the little both parties have revealed about the proceedings, Zoa could have bitch-slapped BS for two hours by objecting non-stop, and the judge could have CORRECTLY sustained the objections, but she didn’t. She let him talk and talk and talk, one of his favorite things to do, especially if it’s about himself.
So, what are his excuses now? The judge is corrupt, Hoge has the hots for Zoa (?????), the judge is still an ignorant rube, and lawyers who are REAL democrats would never, ever represent someone that BS doesn’t like, especially an “evil” conservative like Hoge, and Zoa peed throughout the courtroom. Seriously.
BS thinks that he’s going to appeal and claim that the judge looked embarrassed or uncomfortable by his ruling. I can guarantee that the law clerks will have a good laugh over that one, because all of that is completely subjective and irrelevant on appeal. The truth is that on appellate review, the findings of fact of lower courts are usually given great deference.
As for the judge allegedly not having a computer or a cell phone. Well, he has a computer at work, as do(es) his law clerk(s). You see, most judges have junior staff that help them research issues and write opinions. You know, younger staff . . . who are quite familiar with social media and how it operates.
There seems to be absolutely no contact with reality for Cabin Boy.
Judging by the mendacious BS’s comments, I figured Judge Stansfield must be pushing 80, given the picture of a doddering senile old fool that Schmalfeldt painted. At 63, he is 12 years younger than WJJH and 3 years younger than Hillary Clinton. He is 7 years younger than John Kerry.
Are you sure of your implied age of WJJH? I see more grass cutting with dull scissors.
Typo, typo!!!! Thanks for catching that – 2 (TWO) years younger than WJJH! Don’t know where that “1” came from. Time for another cup of coffee.
I’m only 65. I turn 66 on New Year’s Eve.
No one has done anything to Coprophilia Bill that is worse than what he has done to himself.
IOW, he is his own worst enemy…
Well, he has helpfully posted what will probably comprise a large part of his appeal. I think it’s masterful. Truly awesome. The best legal brief I’ve come across in years. He should definitely file it. Heh.
In it, BS refers to himself as “a great white whale.”I kid you not.
Freudian slip…
He must have been looking over some old beach vacation pictures.
It’s a PowerPoint Presentation!
Looks like he timed it for about ten minutes.
Actually, it appears to be Keynote, but, yeah, it’s a slide deck. I recognize some of the slides from the papers I saw him using as notes. Some of the slides were introduced as exhibits.
Yes, Keynote. Sorry.
While I eventually came to use and appreciate the Mac world, my default use of terminology tends to reflect my upbringing.
But then, it took me ’till the ’80s to stop calling all system memory “core”. 🙂
Some of us were still using core memory into the late ’80 for radiation-hardened systems.
And someday soon, I’ll stop calling Excel spreadsheets “Lotus122 files”.
Don’t you mean Visicalc?
Er, Lotus 1 2 *3* !
Nah, VisiCalc came out during my sabbatical from computers when I toiled as an industrial chemist. A few wasted years before I realized that my college hobby was what I actually wanted to do with my life.
On one hand, lab work was tedious, intellectually unfulfilling and dangerous, but on the other hand, the pay really sucked. And they wouldn’t even spring for Usenet access for me! Cretins.
When I came back, Lotus and Wordstar ruled the day.
Model 33 Teletypes, acousticouplers, 100-baud modems, I/O via an IBM 1401, a PDP8 with 4k of core, …
The good old days weren’t so great.
Barefoot in the snow, uphill, both ways …
Hey, PDP-8 was a work of engineering genius!
Remember, engineering is optimization of a solution under constraints.
Given the constraints, the PDP-8 was *it*!
And upgrading from the PDP8 to PDP11-45 was a huge jump.
And oh! how I loves Assembler. OK, not really. It took forever to build and debug, plus there were those always waiting to trip you while you carried a stack of cards to the server room to see if your latest correction ran sending your cards flying and all out of order.
Wow, back in the day I worked as a summer student on a PDP11-45, I started by keying punch cards for the programmers, then flowcharting, and finally doing some debugging and programming in Fortran. If I was a good boy, one of the operators would let me bootstrap the computer. About once a month a big wig would fly in from Digital in Huntsville Alabama to ask “How y’all doing?” We did a lot better after we figured out the humidifier for the computer room was leaving mineral dust on the cores, so we started using distilled water instead of tap water.