Bonus Prevarication Du Jour

This one isn’t from Cabin Boy Bill Schmalfeldt. It’s from Brett Kimberlin himself. I found these words in an email he sent to a third-party. The email was forwarded to me this morning.

Mr. Hoge and his co-defendants seem to believe that they can try this case online. They believe that they win by causing the most harm [redacted].  They have been warned by numerous attorneys that their actions after the filing of the case will come back to haunt them when the case gets before the judge or jury, yet they obsessively post more and more defamatory statements that add proof of the allegations I have made.

For the umpteenth time, I don’t litigate online. I have made no substantive comments about the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. lawsuit other than to acknowledge its existence, to note that I have filed an answer, and to state that I believe the case is without merit. I’ve joked that Kimberlin left “mopery with intent to lurk” off of his laundry list of torts. And I did offer to let him settle the case on the cheap for a payment to me of $1,000,000. That wasn’t a joke.

As far as I know, none of my codefendants have discussed the merits of the case per se online, but none of us have been shy in expressing our contempt for Brett Kimberlin. Team Kimberlin, OTOH, has been publishing all sorts of attack pieces, longer posts on Breitbart Unmasked or the Cabin Boy’s various sites and shorter jabs on Twitter, in support of Kimberlin’s suit.

The Gentle Reader may decide for himself who is attempting to try the case online.

Of course, the various lawyers involved in the case have counseled caution in what we defendants say about the matter outside of court. Duh. That’s why I haven’t made any substantive comments. However, not a single lawyer who has discussed the case with me expects the case to go to trial.

Since he hasn’t actually filed an amended complaint to add the act of defaming him by publishing a certified copy of a public document, oh, never mind …


4 thoughts on “Bonus Prevarication Du Jour

  1. What I don’t understand is why BS keeps going on about the Kimberlin case as he announced that he had retired from Team Kimberlin some time ago.

    Coincidentally, the same time they left him swinging in the wind,

    All he has left as a “friend” is that one guy?

    And why won’t he answer why his friends are no longer supporting him? What is he hiding?

  2. Brett Kimberlin lies yet again. I seems to be a consistent pattern. Brett Kimberlin is professing to know what advice your attorney’s gave you in private. While your attorney’s may have offered you the standard advice to have them issue all statements concerning this lawsuit, I don’t doubt your reports that they have informed you that Kimberlin’s case is without merit. Certainly, that is what Popehat has publicly written. If they don’t believe that any of your past statements “will came back to haunt them when the case comes before judge, or jury,” I don’t see how they could have possibly stated with certainty that any future statements “will” harm your case. Again, he simply pulled that quote from his ass.

    Had the per se litigant Brett Kimberln consulted his lawyer he too would have been told to not discuss the case, including by e-mail to third parties. Seems Kimberlin is a hypocrite as well as a liar.

    P.S. The comic in me wants to think, “…possible to my good name.” is what you redacted!

Leave a Reply