Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Let’s look at the lawfare record.

Peace Orders:

Kimberlin v. Walker √
Kimberlin v. Walker √
Kimberlin v. Norton √
√ Norton v. Kimberlin
Kimberlin v. Norton √
Hoge v. Kimberlin √
Kimberlin obo Jane Doe v. Hoge √

Law Suits:

Walker v, Kimberlin √
Walker v. Kimberlin √
Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. √
Kimberlin v. National Bloggers Club, et al. √
Kimberlin v. Kimberlin Unmasked (Tie, dismissal)

Most of those check marks are not on Kimberlin’s side, and none are on his side in cases he filed.

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


Here is what Judge Hazel has had to say about The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s RICO Madness—

Kimberlin failed to plead … Kimberlin has failed to adequately plead … Kimberlin has failed to state a claim … Kimberlin has failed to allege … Kimberlin has therefore failed to plead … Kimberlin has failed to adequately plead … he has failed … he has failed … He has failed to do so … the SAC fails to allege … Kimberlin has therefore failed … Kimberlin has failed … Kimberlin has therefore failed to plead … Kimberlin has failed … his SAC failed to identify … attempt would also fail … Kimberlin has therefore failed … Kimberlin failed … necessarily must fail … he has failed … Kimberlin has failed to adequately plead … claim would still fail … Kimberlin has failed … Kimberlin has failed … would still fail … Kimberlin has failed … Kimberlin has failed to allege … Kimberlin has therefore failed … has failed to state a claim … because he has “fail[ed] to plead facts” … must be dismissed as he has failed to plead facts … Kimberlin has failed … dismissal of § 1985(2) claim for failure to allege … his failure … Kimberlin has failed to state claims …

Plaintiff is mistaken.

Yep, that about covers it.

In Re RICO Madness


Judge Hazel has denied The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s motion for reconsideration of dismissal of the Ku Klux Klan Act claims against all defendants in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness.

Qapla’!

UPDATE—The money quote—

Kimberlin is mistaken.

UPDATE 2—FIFY:Explain_the_lawUPDATE 3—Aaron Walker compares Kimberlin’s RICO Madness to Generalissimo Franco.

 

Team Kimberlin Post of the Day


It seems as if every time either The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin or The Dreadful Pro-Se Schmalfeldt files a lawsuit, they include a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. None of those claims have been successful, and I seriously doubt that the claims in their current LOLsuits will do any better.

The Cabin Boy™ has got access to a copy of the Maryland Tort Law Handbook and has managed to misread the section on intentional infliction of emotional distress, causing him to believe he has a winning case.

PreparationH96ctI doubt it. I expect that the Circuit Court for Howard County will rely on the same case law that Judge McGann used to throw out TDPK’s claims in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. nuisance lawsuit. If the court does, TDPS’s claim is toast. As several commenters have pointed out, butthurt is not a cause of action.

movie popcornOTOH, I can offer some relief for butthurt. Click here.

If you’d rather have popcorn, click here.

And stay tuned.

In Re RICO Madness


The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin has filed a letter asking for permission to file a motion for reconsideration of Judge Hazel’s dismissal of the Ku Klux Klan Act claims in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness.

Also, Aaron Walker, Lee Stranahan, Stacy McCain, and I have jointly filed a letter asking for permission to file a motion for sanctions against Kimberlin.

Our letter speaks for itself, and I do not plan to make any substantive public comments on the matters it covers until after the court has ruled on granting permission to file.