ANNOUNCER: From Westminster, it’s time for—
SOUND: Skype rings once.
JOHNNY: Johnny Atsign.
RULE 5 GIRL: (Telephone Filter) Good evening, Johnny.
JOHNNY: Well, hello!
RULE 5 GIRL: (Telephone Filter) Have you been reading any of the junk Bunny Boy’s been publishing lately?
JOHNNY: Not really. What have I missed?
RULE 5 GIRL: He’s done a post about that suit against The Bomber, and some of the comments are disturbing?
JOHNNY: Really? I’ll take a look.
MUSIC: Theme up and under.
ANNOUNCER: The Lickspittle Broadcasting System presents W. J. J. Hoge in the transcribed adventures of the man with the action-packed Twitter account, America’s fabulous free-lance Internet investigator …
JOHNNY: Yours Truly, Johnny Atsign!
MUSIC: Theme up to music out. Continue reading
Breitbart Unmasked Bunny Boy Unread they’re making bigger fools of themselves than usual going on about Aaron Walker’s lawsuit against the Kimberlins. The comment section is particularly asinine, including gratuitous comment about me (who has noting to do with the suit) from the likes of Mark in MD WI.
The derp is great with this bunch.
Scott Johnson has a post up at PowerLine on the gender neutral pronoun fiasco at the University of Tennessee.
I don’t see the need for these new pronouns. English already has a pronoun that is neither male nor female—it.
A large portion of the allegations in The Dread Pro-Se Kimberlin’s complaint in the Kimberlin v. Most of the Universe, et al. RICO Retread LOLsuit are facially false. Consider this whopper.In that sentence TDPK claims to know what we did after he wrote the sentence while he was still writing it. OTOH, he’s made a similar allegation before. This is from the second amended complaint in the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness.Other than the list of names, those sentences are the same. Indeed, the following portions of both paragraphs are also identical.
It’s very clear now that Brett Kimberlin doesn’t know how to properly structure a civil complaint. He has bitten off more than he can chew.
The desire of appearing clever often prevents our becoming so.
—François de La Rochefoucauld
According to PACER, The Dreadful Pro-Se Schmalfeldt really did file this—
UPDATE—Among the first bits of nonsense one finds in the Cabin Boy’s™ opposition is the whining that Patrick Grady has filled four motions, etc., without answering the Cabin Boy’s™ complaint. Rule 12(b) motions are made and disposed of before any answer is filed. In the Kimberlin v. The Universe, et al. RICO Madness, I filed more than a dozen motions, oppositions, replies, etc., before the case was dismissed. I never filed an answer; that case never got that far.
Similarly, I doubt that any of the defendants will ever have to answer Schmalfeldt’s complaint. That’s not to say that one won’t do so. A defendant would have to answer the complaint to file any counterclaims or …
Of course, nothing I’ve written here at Hogewash! comes remotely close to undermining Patrick Grady’s arguments concerning personal jurisdiction in the Cabin Boy’s LOLsuit.
OTOH, Bill Schmalfeldt is a laughing matter.
I don’t mean that his lawfare shouldn’t be taken seriously. It must be. What I mean is that he is not a serious person himself. He is an intellectual lightweight. He has an overinflated ego. And he is in over his head.
He is also vile and has spent much of the past decade inflicting himself on others via the Internet. XMFan, Daily Kos, Facebook, etc., have banned or suspended him. He now maintains his presence by moving from blog to blog and Twitter account to Twitter account while playing musical chairs with Internet radio feeds. And his faildoxes keep on coming.
A couple of years ago, some folks, I was among them, had had enough of the Cabin Boy™, and we began taking legal action against him. I was the first to be successful, but others have also succeeded in getting restraining orders against him. Schmalfeldt has tried various legal counterattacks, and all have failed or are failing. Schmalfeldt has further beclowned himself with his lawfare.
While Schmalfledt’s lawfare must be dealt with seriously in the courts of law, it should be subjected to ridicule in the courts of public opinion. Thus, one of my responses to his lawfare might be termed LOLfare. Somethings simply deserve to be laughed at.
UPDATE—Caution! Crackpot Theory Alert!Also, the Cabin Boy™ hereby demonstrates his inability to correctly read the emotional responses of others. There is a huge difference between anger and derisive laughter.