Dread Pirate #BrettKimberlin and Rent


One of the claims that TDPK has tried to make in his Motion to Dismiss the federal Walker v. Kimberlin, et al. lawsuit is that the District Court in Maryland is an improper venue for the suit. That is, of course, nonsense, but instead of fisking his motion myself, let me quote what Aaron Walker’s response says:

As Plaintiff details in his Complaint, a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in Maryland. Defendant brought and maintained frivolous civil actions against Plaintiff in Maryland. … Indeed, Defendant is domiciled in Maryland and it is here, at his base of operations in his mother’s basement, the rent for which is paid by Defendant’s organizations, [fn] that Kimberlin runs the organizations and plans his frivolous litigation and threats. … From his luxurious basement offices, renting in 2008 at more than $600 per year of tax-preferenced dollars for each square foot of the entire property, Defendant brought unjustified bar complaints against Plaintiff, adversely affecting his ability to practice as an attorney … Indeed, all of Defendant’s actions of which Plaintiff complains—including his repeated threats and instigation of vexatious litigation—at least partially occurred, or emanated from, Maryland.

[footnote] The rental price for the home has, in some years, amounted to more than 20% of this residential property’s entire assessed value.

That sorta/kinda establishes a nexus with Maryland, doesn’t it?

There’s more action coming in the federal lawsuit, but there’s been an interesting turn of events in the Virginia case over the weekend as well. I expect to have some more news around noon. Popcorn might go well with lunch today.

Stay tuned.

2 thoughts on “Dread Pirate #BrettKimberlin and Rent

  1. Popcorn for lunch sounds just fine with me.

    Ya know, if I din’t know better I would say that Mr. Walkers response claims that there may be some sort of funny business going on with the tax returns for Brett Kimberlin’s non-profits. But no. They couldn’t be claiming that. Not from such a fine, convicted perjurer as TDPK…

  2. I’m pretty sure venue is proper where the Defendant resides. Kimberlin resides in Md, venue is proper in Md. End of inquiry.

    Defendant could petition for REMOVAL of the case to another jurisdiction, but that’s different than improper venue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s